|
Advances in Assessments for Legal Competencies |
|
|
1 | (20) |
|
|
2 | (8) |
|
Legal Competencies in the Criminal Process |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
Legal Competencies in Civil Cases |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Improving Evaluations for Legal Competencies: How Far Have We Come? |
|
|
10 | (9) |
|
Ignorance and Irrelevance |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
Insufficiency and Incredibility |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
The Value of a Conceptual Model |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Legally Relevant Assessments for Legal Competencies |
|
|
21 | (20) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Five Components of Legal Competencies |
|
|
23 | (16) |
|
|
23 | (6) |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
|
32 | (4) |
|
Judgmental and Dispositional Components |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
Empirical Assessments for Legal Competencies |
|
|
41 | (28) |
|
Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
42 | (7) |
|
Objectives of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
The Need for Evaluation of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Standards for Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
49 | (15) |
|
Conceptual Basis: Defining Legally Relevant Functional Abilities |
|
|
50 | (5) |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Predictive or Classificatory Utility |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Potential for Expressing Person-Situation Congruency |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Orientation to the Instrument Reviews |
|
|
64 | (5) |
|
Discovery and Selection of the Instruments |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Purposes and Outline of the Review Chapters |
|
|
65 | (4) |
|
Competence to Stand Trial |
|
|
69 | (80) |
|
|
69 | (20) |
|
|
70 | (12) |
|
From Legal Standard to Forensic Assessment |
|
|
82 | (7) |
|
Review of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
89 | (50) |
|
MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA) |
|
|
90 | (11) |
|
Fitness Interview Test---Revised (FIT-R) |
|
|
101 | (7) |
|
Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR) |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
Georgia Court Competence Test---Mississippi State Hospital (GCCT-MSH) |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
Competence to Stand Trial Assessment Instrument (CAI) |
|
|
121 | (9) |
|
Competence Screening Test (CST) |
|
|
130 | (9) |
|
Current Status of The Field |
|
|
139 | (10) |
|
|
139 | (6) |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
Waiver of Rights to Silence and Legal Counsel |
|
|
149 | (44) |
|
|
149 | (14) |
|
|
150 | (7) |
|
From Legal Standard to Forensic Assessment |
|
|
157 | (6) |
|
Review of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
163 | (23) |
|
Comprehension of Miranda Rights (CMR) |
|
|
164 | (9) |
|
Comprehension of Miranda Rights---Recognition (CMR-R) |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
Comprehension of Miranda Vocabulary (CMV) |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
Function of Rights in Interrogation (FRI) |
|
|
181 | (5) |
|
Current Status of the Field |
|
|
186 | (7) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity |
|
|
193 | (36) |
|
|
|
193 | (16) |
|
|
195 | (8) |
|
From Legal Standard to Forensic Assessment |
|
|
203 | (6) |
|
Review of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
209 | (14) |
|
Mental State at the Time of the Offense Screening Evaluation (MSE) |
|
|
209 | (7) |
|
Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales (R-CRAS) |
|
|
216 | (7) |
|
Current Status of the Field |
|
|
223 | (6) |
|
|
223 | (2) |
|
|
225 | (4) |
|
|
229 | (80) |
|
|
|
|
229 | (29) |
|
Abuse, Neglect, and Termination of Parental Rights |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (18) |
|
From Legal Standard to Forensic Assessment |
|
|
250 | (8) |
|
Review of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
258 | (43) |
|
Ackerman-Schoendorf Scales for Parent Evaluation of Custody (ASPECT) |
|
|
258 | (10) |
|
Bricklin Perceptual Scales (BPS) |
|
|
268 | (6) |
|
Perception of Relationships Test (PORT) |
|
|
274 | (4) |
|
Parent Awareness Skills Survey (PASS) and Parent Perception of Child Profile (PPCP) |
|
|
278 | (3) |
|
Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI) |
|
|
281 | (11) |
|
Parenting Stress Index (PSI) |
|
|
292 | (6) |
|
Parent-Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI) |
|
|
298 | (3) |
|
Current Status of the Field |
|
|
301 | (8) |
|
|
301 | (5) |
|
|
306 | (3) |
|
Guardianship and Conservatorship |
|
|
309 | (82) |
|
|
|
309 | (22) |
|
|
313 | (9) |
|
From Legal Standard to Forensic Assessment |
|
|
322 | (9) |
|
Review of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
331 | (3) |
|
IADL Instruments Based on Interview or Observation |
|
|
334 | (18) |
|
Adult Functional Adaptive Behavior Scale (AFABS) |
|
|
334 | (4) |
|
Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire (MFAQ) |
|
|
338 | (8) |
|
Philadelphia Geriatric Center Multilevel Assessment Inventory (MAI) |
|
|
346 | (6) |
|
Performance Based Instruments to Assess IADL's |
|
|
352 | (7) |
|
Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS) |
|
|
352 | (5) |
|
Everyday Problems Test (EPT) |
|
|
357 | (2) |
|
Performance Based Instruments to Assess Need for Guardian or Conservator |
|
|
359 | (19) |
|
Decisionmaking Instrument for Guardianship (DIG) |
|
|
359 | (4) |
|
Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI) |
|
|
363 | (4) |
|
Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview (HCAI) |
|
|
367 | (2) |
|
Independent Living Scales (ILS) |
|
|
369 | (9) |
|
Current Status of the Field |
|
|
378 | (13) |
|
|
378 | (9) |
|
|
387 | (4) |
|
Competence to Consent to Treatment |
|
|
391 | (70) |
|
|
391 | (13) |
|
|
393 | (5) |
|
From Legal Standard to Forensic Assessment |
|
|
398 | (6) |
|
Review of Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
404 | (49) |
|
Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI) |
|
|
405 | (7) |
|
Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview (HCAI) |
|
|
412 | (4) |
|
Hopkins Competency Assessment Test (HCAT) |
|
|
416 | (5) |
|
MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) |
|
|
421 | (8) |
|
MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) |
|
|
429 | (6) |
|
Understanding Treatment Disclosures (UTD) |
|
|
435 | (5) |
|
Perceptions of Disorder (POD) |
|
|
440 | (7) |
|
Thinking Rationally about Treatment (TRAT) |
|
|
447 | (3) |
|
|
450 | (3) |
|
Current Status of the Field |
|
|
453 | (8) |
|
|
453 | (5) |
|
|
458 | (3) |
|
Developing and Using Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
461 | (22) |
|
Developing Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
462 | (11) |
|
|
462 | (7) |
|
|
469 | (2) |
|
|
471 | (1) |
|
Judgmental and Dispositional Components |
|
|
472 | (1) |
|
Using Forensic Assessment Instruments |
|
|
473 | (6) |
|
|
474 | (1) |
|
Selecting Assessment Methods |
|
|
474 | (1) |
|
Describing Functional Abilities |
|
|
475 | (1) |
|
Explaining Functional Deficits |
|
|
476 | (1) |
|
Making Predictions or Postdictions |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
A Note on Potential Misuse of FAIs |
|
|
478 | (1) |
|
Continuing the Improvement of Forensic Assessments |
|
|
479 | (4) |
|
|
479 | (1) |
|
|
480 | (3) |
References |
|
483 | (32) |
Legal Citations |
|
515 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
519 | |