The Judicial System of Russia paints a portrait of the courts of the Russian Federation under Putin, how they work in practice, and what shapes the behaviour of its judges. It stresses the dual nature of a judicial system, where ordinary cases are for the most part handled fairly, but where cases of interest to powerful persons are subject to influence--a common situation in authoritarian states. In so doing, the authors trace the origins of some contemporary practices to the Soviet past, but also identify novelties. They pay close attention to the struggles of reformers to make the courts fairer and more efficient, along with the measures taken to ensure that judges conform to the expectations of their political masters. This means dealing with the evolution of judicial governance, including the selection, promotion, and disciplining of judges.

In studying the actual operation of the courts, the authors take a socio-legal approach, emphasizing how different players (petitioners, respondents, lawyers, prosecutors, accused, judges) behave and why. This means dealing with the full gamut of courts from justices of the peace through the Supreme and Constitutional Courts and analysing their conduct in ordinary civil disputes, criminal cases, business disputes, administrative justice (claims against state officials), and constitutional matters. The authors also examine the relation of the public to the courts, including its readiness to litigate disputes despite generally negative views of the courts.

This analysis of the administration of justice in Russia covers both the Constitutional Amendments of 2020 and developments relating to the first months of the 2022 War in Ukraine. It is a must read for academics, practitioners, and all those with an interest in comparative courts and Russia's judicial system.

Kathryn Hendley, Roman Z. Livshits and Theodore W. Brazeau Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Law School,Peter H. Solomon, Jr., Emeritus Professor of Political Science, Law, and Criminology, University of Toronto, Munk School

Kathryn Hendley is Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research documents the dualistic nature of the Russian legal system and the willingness of Russians (both individuals and entities) to take routine disputes to their courts. She has carried out ethnographic research in Russia's arbitrazh and justice-of-the-peace courts and was the first to field a survey of Russian lawyers that included all specialties. Her work has been funded by Fulbright, the NSF, the World Bank, and others, and has been published in major social science journals.

Peter H. Solomon, Jr. is Emeritus Professor of Political Science, Law and Criminology at the University of Toronto and Member of its Centre for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. He has written extensively on the history of courts and criminal justice in the USSR and its successor states. His research is currently focused on judicial reform in Russia and Ukraine, where he has participated in projects with the World Bank, OSCE, and the Canadian International Development Agency), as well as on criminal law, procedure, and justice in authoritarian and transitional states.

PART ONE: Historical Perspectives
1. Legacies from the Past: Tsarism and the Soviet Experience
2. The (Re)Making of Courts and Judicial Governance, 1988-2021
PART TWO: People, Attitudes, Politics
3. Judges and the Judiciary: Recruitment, Discipline, Careers
4. Lawyers: Training and Role in the Courts
5. Public Attitudes Towards Courts and the Use of Courts
6. Cases with Outside or Inappropriate Influence
PART THREE: The Administration of Justice or Courts in Action
7. Justice-of-the-Peace Courts and Everyday Law
8. The Administration of Criminal Justice
9. Civil Justice
10. The Arbitrazh Courts and Business Disputes
11. Constitutional and Administrative Justice